Texarkana, TX 87° Thu H 94° L 75° Fri H 93° L 77° Sat H 92° L 74° Weather Sponsored By:

It's 'Game of Thrones' final season

It's 'Game of Thrones' final season

What do we know about what's to come? Not much, deities be thanked

April 13th, 2019 by Chicago Tribune in Features

This photo of released by HBO shows Sean Bean portraying Eddard Stark in "Game of Thrones." Where most "Game of Thrones" fans were horrified by the beheading of the beloved Ned Stark and blamed it on a ruthless king, Columbia University business professor Bruce Craven saw a lesson in failed leadership. The final season of the popular series premieres on April 14. (HBO via AP)

In the end, the Night King will reign supreme over Westeros, and all of the humans who tried to resist him will be converted into those proto-zombies known as White Walkers, sad trombone.

Sorry, no, that's wrong. When it is all over, when the epic battle of battles has been fought, Sansa Stark will be left occupying the Iron Throne, saddened over the loss of so many friends, family members and even worthy enemies but nonetheless determined to rule what remains of humankind with compassion and resolve, moderately triumphal bugle cry.

Or, wait: It's the Clegane brothers, the Hound and the Mountain, once mortal enemies, who will emerge from the coming test of tactical mettle as survivors and co-sovereigns on this side of the Narrow Sea. Their champion at tournaments—and commercial sponsor—will, of course, be the Bud Knight, no trumpet notes necessary.

This image released by HBO shows Michelle Fairley portraying Catelyn Stark in a scene from "Game of Thrones." The final season premieres on Sunday. (HBO via AP)

This image released by HBO shows Michelle Fairley...

What I'm trying to say here is that A) everything sounds better with a horn section and B) almost anything could happen when "Game of Thrones," HBO's sprawling epic about dragons, monarchy and the gratuitous nudity they inspire, comes back to our screens tonight and then, five weeks and six episodes later, goes away again forever.

Put another way, I'm saying: Spoiler not alert, at least regarding Season 8 (Seasons 1-7 are fair game). Like Jon Snow back in the early years of "GoT," when he was but a handsome illegitimate lad on a frosty inter-tribal carnal lark, I know nothing. And I can give away nothing in these coming paragraphs that will taint your viewing of the wrap-up of this eight-year sword opera splayed across an imaginary Middle Ages.

But like any decent "GoT" follower, I suspect things. I hope for things. I have to, as the Tribune writer who does the "Game of Thrones" recaps each Sunday night, staying up late to offer a crystalline distillation of what just happened on screen, or at least coherent sentences. And I have followed the scant news that the "Thrones" team has allowed to dribble out of their kitchen like one-bite appetizers for a late-afternoon cocktail party. But I do not know.

And not knowing, to my way of thinking, is a good thing. You can go deep into the corners of Reddit or winteriscoming.net to find wildly entertaining fan theories: Ned Stark is really alive thanks to a body switch engineered by the faceless men. This whole story we have witnessed is actually from the writings of Samwell Tarly, and he is, by the way, yet another secret Targaryen. Speaking of Targaryens, Daenerys is a Mad King-in-waiting.

Or you can sit back and revel in the ride, experience, perhaps for the last time, television the way television has historically been presented: one episode at a time, over time. This way, anticipation can build, characters (and actors) can grow and change, and a great number of us can afterward stand around water coolers of the thirst-quenching or metaphorical kind and enjoy this broadly shared storytelling experience, one of the few cultural commonalities that remains to us. Oh, and without the temptation to binge watch, we can all report to work the next day without telltale eye bags.

There are a few important things that we cannot help but know about this season. For one thing, the show is building toward a super-mega-battle that will make even Season 6's "Battle of the Bastards" look modest. The 11-week filming of this battle and the endurance it required of cast and crew is one of the few plot facts that HBO has allowed the actors to talk about, and it is "expected to be the longest consecutive battle sequence ever committed to film," Entertainment Weekly said in its report from the set, the only one HBO allowed.

This will be, to one degree or another, the "Winter Is Coming" battle that the whole series has been pointing toward, the one where the Night King's frozen undead armies from the North plus his newly undead zombie dragon try to take over from those petty, perpetually feuding humans situated south of them. Given their documented venality over seven seasons, many of these particular bipedal persons may not particularly deserve survival, but viewers should have a rooting interest in it, nonetheless, grounded in basic Darwinian theory and unapologetic speciesism. Also, I think we all root for the Starks, not counting Bran, who is the Dorne of the Starks.

This battle will most likely come in Episode 5 of this season's six, partly because "GoT" has a history of doing big things in penultimate episodes, partly because we have been told that episode was directed by Miguel Sapochnik, who was so masterful with the Battle of the Bastards (which aired in a penultimate episode). Sapochnik also directs the season's third episode, but that just seems too soon for the show's equivalent of the World Series, Wrestlemania and Waterloo wrapped into one. Both episodes, incidentally are about 80 minutes long, like the other two of the final four episodes. The first two of the season check in at under an hour each.

This combination of photos released by HBO shows, from left, Kerry Ingram portraying Shireen Baratheon, Eugene Simon portraying Lancel Lannister, Sibel Kekilli portraying Shae, Esme Bianco portraying Ros and Julian Glover portraying Grand Maester Pycelle in the HBO series "Game of Thrones." The final season premieres on Sunday. (HBO via AP)

This combination of photos released by HBO shows,...

We know that a top HBO executive has said the showrunners D.B. Weiss and David Benioff delivered an ending that will be "dramatically satisfying and emotionally satisfying" to fans, as Peter Sagal, "Wait Wait Don't Tell Me!" host and cohost of the podcast "Nerdette Recaps Game of Thrones with Peter Sagal" says in the video preview we recorded for chicagotribune.com. This seems to promise no "Seinfeld"-style undercutting of the main characters, no "Sopranos"-style mystery, and no "Sex and the City"-style pandering wrap-up.

"Satisfying" probably means a human being and his or her kind will emerge victorious, in one way or another, again for unabashedly speciesist reasons. But given the "Thrones" history of tinkering with main-character lifelines and audience expectations, "satisfying" could very well mean we'll end up with a big surprise on the throne. Rather than the expected Jon Snow and/or his lover/aunt Daenerys, it could well be a Tyrion Lannister in the big knifey chair. Perhaps his sister Cersei will be ensconced in a revolutionary co-monarchy with her perpetual glass of wine.

Or just maybe the good people who remain will get together and decide the traditional system of hereditary feudal rule is inherently unfair to the peasant classes and antithetical to the idea of a meritocracy and now is the time to give agrarian socialism a true chance. Like I said, surprise.

We do not know what to expect from some of the show's wild cards, the figures who have receded into the background but just may return to impact the conclusion. What of Melisandre, ageless and red, off to some foreign isle, ostensibly to recruit allies? What of Brandon Stark, whose forays back into time would seem to allow him to maybe, possibly, alter current events? And what about the direwolves? I miss the direwolves.

We certainly know that this last blast of the show has been far too long in arriving, especially since this is not really the eighth season but rather the second half of the seventh season. The first half ended after seven episodes some 20 months ago, back in August of 2017. We were different people then, curious to see what this Robert Mueller fellow would dredge up, intrigued to watch whatever interviews respected broadcasters Charlie Rose and Matt Lauer would do next, and so on. Indeed, it has been so long that in writing this I have had to double-check how to spell both "Daenerys" and "Targaryen."

On the other hand, the evidence suggests that it has been exactly the right length of time away. When HBO put out that two-minute trailer for the coming final season in early March, it was like "Game of Thrones" had never left us. The hype immediately returned to Frazier-Ali levels. And we forgot our long abandonment—at least until it comes out in therapy—because we were all just so thrilled that Mother (of Dragons) came back to us.

You want anecdotal proof of the tenterhooks the show's return has fans on? Just today I saw an email header saying one "David Boroff" had requested to join my network on Linked In and—true story—my mind at first read it as "David Benioff," because of course the "Game of Thrones" showrunner would be friending me on a vocation-based website and, yes, sure, hand to my heart, I'd probably consider a job writing on his next series. Oh, wait: "Boroff."

The trailer did its job, too. It teased just enough information to fuel the fires, but not so much as to make viewing anticlimactic. We learned Arya Stark, for instance, has apparently continued on her assassinary ways rather than, say, going off to study the classics at university. She's seen with a big knife, and running, and with blood on her face.

We learned Jaime Lannister, last seen finally abandoning his treacherous sister/lover to join the fight for humanity up by Winterfell, has enough of a beard that he looks like an investment banker just starting in his new career at the microbrewery he funded.

We didn't learn much about Tyrion or Sansa, except that they are, at some point, still alive in the season. Ditto for time-traveling mystic and wet blanket-to-drama Bran; the answer, he always seems to be trying to tell us, lies right where I am looking, in the middle distance.

We also learned that Dany and Jon are seemingly still an item. They hold hands together. They approach the two living dragons together. Apparently nobody has told them what Bran and Samwell and viewers now know, that Jon is really a Targaryen and rightful heir to the throne and that Dany is really his aunt. Oh, and that Jon is not illegitimate, but rather the product of a secret marriage. Even if they had been told, it may not have mattered, because in the lore of the series, Targaryens marry Targaryens.

But, really, it's not necessary to know any more. I came across a new promotional teaser, just out this week, showing a certain important place in the series in seeming ruins. You can look it up if you want, but it is a thing I really wish I did not know as I prepare to watch.

At its best, "Game of Thrones" has been rollicking storytelling that you can enjoy without thinking about it as a climate-change allegory, without wondering which character derives from which historical monarch, and without having or wanting to work hard to stay ahead of the plot.

It is enough to know that winter is here, and the battle shall be joined, and maybe spring is coming?

The new season starts at 8 p.m. today on HBO.

Getting Started/Comments Policy

Getting started

  1. 1. If you frequently comment on news websites then you may already have a Disqus account. If so, click the "Login" button at the top right of the comment widget and choose whether you'd rather log in with Facebook, Twitter, Google, or a Disqus account.
  2. 2. If you've forgotten your password, Disqus will email you a link that will allow you to create a new one. Easy!
  3. 3. If you're not a member yet, Disqus will go ahead and register you. It's seamless and takes about 10 seconds.
  4. 4. To register, either go through the login process or just click in the box that says "join the discussion," type your comment, and either choose a social media platform to log you in or create a Disqus account with your email address.
  5. 5. If you use Twitter, Facebook or Google to log in, you will need to stay logged into that platform in order to comment. If you create a Disqus account instead, you'll need to remember your Disqus password. Either way, you can change your display name if you'd rather not show off your real name.
  6. 6. Don't be a huge jerk or do anything illegal, and you'll be fine.

Texarkana Gazette Comments Policy

The Texarkana Gazette web sites include interactive areas in which users can express opinions and share ideas and information. We cannot and do not monitor all of the material submitted to the website. Additionally, we do not control, and are not responsible for, content submitted by users. By using the web sites, you may be exposed to content that you may find offensive, indecent, inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise objectionable. You agree that you must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with, the use of the Gazette web sites and any content on the Gazette web sites, including, but not limited to, whether you should rely on such content. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you acknowledge that we shall have the right (but not the obligation) to review any content that you have submitted to the Gazette, and to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content that we determine, in our sole discretion, (a) does not comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement; (b) might violate any law, infringe upon the rights of third parties, or subject us to liability for any reason; or (c) might adversely affect our public image, reputation or goodwill. Moreover, we reserve the right to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content at any time, for the reasons set forth above, for any other reason, or for no reason. If you believe that any content on any of the Gazette web sites infringes upon any copyrights that you own, please contact us pursuant to the procedures outlined in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (Title 17 U.S.C. § 512) at the following address:

Copyright Agent
The Texarkana Gazette
15 Pine Street
Texarkana, TX 75501
Phone: 903-794-3311
Email: webeditor@texarkanagazette.com