Texarkana, TX 48° View Live Radar Tue H 68° L 46° Wed H 64° L 42° Thu H 67° L 45° Weather Sponsored By:

Stripping Wilder's name from literature award?

Stripping Wilder's name from literature award?

July 10th, 2018 by Christine Flowers in Opinion Columns

Last week, at its convention in New Orleans, the American Library Association announced that it was dropping Laura Ingalls Wilder's name from the prestigious children's literature award that was created in her honor in 1954, three years before her death.

The award "recognizes authors and illustrators whose books have created
a lasting contribution to children's literature" and has been given to only 23 people over the past 60 years.

The reason the ALA gave for erasing Wilder's name from the award is that "although (her) work holds a significant place in the history of children's
literature and continues to be read today, (we) had to grapple with the inconsistency between (the author's) legacy and (our) core values of inclusiveness, integrity and respect. Wilder's books reflect dated cultural attitudes toward indigenous people and people of color that contradict modern acceptance, celebration, and understanding of diverse communities."

Translation: Laura's mother, Ma Ingalls, didn't like "the Indians," and at some places in the six-book arc there were characters who called them "wild animals" or otherwise showed a
lack of respect for their plight.

While it's nice to pretend in 2018 that the Indians (am I even allowed to use that term today?) were all peaceful and accommodating, that's not the case.

It's fine to look into—and sympathize with—the roots of their aggression, and it's legitimate to place it in the context of the usurpation of their land and the
elimination of their way of life, but to blame Laura Ingalls Wilder for writing about the conflicts from
her own 1940s perspective is a bit much. It is, in
fact, completely unreasonable.

This isn't the first time that the Guardians of Cultural Sensitivity have gone on the warpath.

In 2010, a school district in Virginia tried to remove the 50th anniversary edition of "The Diary of Anne Frank" from its curriculum. That same year, "Brave New World" was slated to be removed from a school in Maryland for overt sexual content, and the following year it was again challenged by parents and teachers in Washington state because of "racially derogatory" imagery about Native Americans. "The Catcher in the Rye," the classic coming-of-age tale, has been the frequent target of censors. Even Harry Potter has been attacked by fundamentalist Christians because it depicts "black magic." There have been moves to eliminate "Huckleberry Finn" from libraries and reading lists because the runaway slave Jim is called the N-word, and there was a recent attempt to get rid of "To Kill a Mockingbird" because of what an NAACP official called its "oppressive language."

Let's get real, folks. Language is not oppressive.

Censoring language is oppressive to all, and infantilizing to the people who are allegedly protected from its harsh sounds.

How disrespectful to assume that members of the African-American community can't deal with hearing the N-word set in the context of time and place.

How foolish to think that Native Americans will be mortally wounded by passages describing an era when indigenous people and the "white man" (gosh, are we offended by that?) were natural enemies.

More important, how
dangerous it is to acquiesce in the misguided opinion (shared by pretentious
intellectuals and narrow-minded demagogues alike) that children should be bubble-wrapped in
a cocoon of multicultural, pure and unadulterated,
and hopelessly sterile "sensitivity." They deserve much better than to be protected from the world like that.

What's next? Can we next expect that the Bible will be edited so that Delilah's cutting of Samson's hair is reframed as the #MeToo moment of a woman taking her life into her own hands? Will "The Grinch Who Stole Christmas," written
by another winner of the Not-the-Laura-Ingalls-Wilder Award, be changed to "The Grinch Who Borrowed Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa and Festivus"? Will Arthur Miller's "All My Sons" be changed to "All My Gender-Fluid Offspring"? And can we expect Barack Obama's "Dreams from My Father" to be changed to "Dreams from My Father Even Though My Mother Had Great Dreams Too"?

The ALA insists that "updating the award's name should not be construed as censorship."

That's a bunch of Sitting Bull on the Prairie, if you ask me.

Getting Started/Comments Policy

Getting started

  1. 1. If you frequently comment on news websites then you may already have a Disqus account. If so, click the "Login" button at the top right of the comment widget and choose whether you'd rather log in with Facebook, Twitter, Google, or a Disqus account.
  2. 2. If you've forgotten your password, Disqus will email you a link that will allow you to create a new one. Easy!
  3. 3. If you're not a member yet, Disqus will go ahead and register you. It's seamless and takes about 10 seconds.
  4. 4. To register, either go through the login process or just click in the box that says "join the discussion," type your comment, and either choose a social media platform to log you in or create a Disqus account with your email address.
  5. 5. If you use Twitter, Facebook or Google to log in, you will need to stay logged into that platform in order to comment. If you create a Disqus account instead, you'll need to remember your Disqus password. Either way, you can change your display name if you'd rather not show off your real name.
  6. 6. Don't be a huge jerk or do anything illegal, and you'll be fine.

Texarkana Gazette Comments Policy

The Texarkana Gazette web sites include interactive areas in which users can express opinions and share ideas and information. We cannot and do not monitor all of the material submitted to the website. Additionally, we do not control, and are not responsible for, content submitted by users. By using the web sites, you may be exposed to content that you may find offensive, indecent, inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise objectionable. You agree that you must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with, the use of the Gazette web sites and any content on the Gazette web sites, including, but not limited to, whether you should rely on such content. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you acknowledge that we shall have the right (but not the obligation) to review any content that you have submitted to the Gazette, and to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content that we determine, in our sole discretion, (a) does not comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement; (b) might violate any law, infringe upon the rights of third parties, or subject us to liability for any reason; or (c) might adversely affect our public image, reputation or goodwill. Moreover, we reserve the right to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content at any time, for the reasons set forth above, for any other reason, or for no reason. If you believe that any content on any of the Gazette web sites infringes upon any copyrights that you own, please contact us pursuant to the procedures outlined in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (Title 17 U.S.C. § 512) at the following address:

Copyright Agent
The Texarkana Gazette
15 Pine Street
Texarkana, TX 75501
Phone: 903-794-3311
Email: webeditor@texarkanagazette.com