Texarkana, TX 76° Wed H 85° L 62° Thu H 85° L 62° Fri H 87° L 68° Weather Sponsored By:

Score is not the measure of when U.S. Open is a good test

Score is not the measure of when U.S. Open is a good test

June 19th, 2019 by Associated Press in Sports Pro

Gary Woodland posses with the trophy after winning the U.S. Open Championship golf tournament Sunday, June 16, 2019, in Pebble Beach, Calif. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

PEBBLE BEACH, Calif.—The leaderboard next to the 18th green at the U.S. Open again was filled with red numbers under par.

The only difference was the scenery.

This was Pebble Beach, set along the rugged California coast. Gary Woodland finished at 271 for a three-shot victory over Brooks Koepka. They were among 11 players who broke 280, for so many years the scoring standard of a strong test at the U.S. Open.

It might as well have been Erin Hills, built on pure Wisconsin pastureland, where two years ago Koepka shot 272 for a four-shot victory in a U.S. Open littered with red numbers—eight players broke 280—and complaints that the toughest test in golf had lost its identity.

In fact, they shared one identity: Neither had any wind.

It's rare for Pebble Beach to have virtually no wind over four days of any tournament, much less a U.S. Open. Only two players in the previous five U.S. Opens at Pebble Beach shot lower than 284—Tiger Woods (272) with his 15-shot victory in 2000, the year no one else broke par; and Tom Watson (282) when he finished birdie-birdie for a two-shot victory over Jack Nicklaus in 1982.

There were 31 players who were at 283 or better at this U.S. Open, including amateur Viktor Hovland and Nate Lashley, a 36-year-old making his U.S. Open debut.

The overwhelming verdict was the USGA got this U.S. Open right, perhaps because everyone was expecting something to go wrong.

Phil Mickelson even tipped his cap.

Remember, it was Mickelson who said, "One hundred percent of the time, they have messed it up if it doesn't rain." He tried to sidestep compliments on Thursday ("It seems like they did a heck of job") until he was practically gushing on Sunday, even after he extended his record to 0-28 in the one major he has never won.

"It's perfect," he said. "It's a perfect, hard test."

On that it's difficult to argue.

The rough was so lush and gnarly that it took brute strength to get shots to stop on the green. The putting surfaces became increasingly faster as the week went on, even though they never had that sheen from the sun, because it was hiding behind a thick marine layer all week.

This U.S. Open at Pebble had no shadows.

The fairways were about as narrow as in 2010, when Graeme McDowell won at even par. In some cases, they were narrower.

Where the USGA got it right was not reacting to soft clouds and little more than a breeze. Where the setup staff got it right was not hyperventilating at the sight of so many red numbers on the board and in the record book.

The lowest U.S. Open round at Pebble Beach was the 65 by Woods in the first round of his historic rout.

Justin Rose matched it Thursday. Woodland matched it Friday.

They played on until they got the right winner. Woodland might not have the pedigree of other U.S. Open champions at Pebble Beach, but he delivered the kind of shots that will take their place in Pebble Beach lore. He tied a U.S. Open record with only four bogeys in 72 holes.

Koepka might have earned as much respect for his runner-up finish as his previous two U.S. Open titles.

There were no gimmicks, just good golf.

John Bodenhamer, the senior managing director of championships at the USGA, was in charge of setting up the course this year. The USGA says that was the plan all along, for Mike Davis to devote more duties to his role as CEO and turn over the golf course to others. Hardly anyone believed that. It had the look of a knee-jerk reaction from another debacle at Shinnecock Hills the previous year.

Bodenhamer was asked which was more plausible: that a change in duties had been in the works before Shinnecock, or that the USGA doesn't care about par? He laughed, and then came across as more credible than the USGA's standard denial about trying to protect par.

"We do pay attention to score," Bodenhamer said before the U.S. Open. "We want it to be challenging and tough, true to what the architect intended, a fair test that players feel good about it."

The scoring suggests the USGA is going soft. What's happening is the players are getting better.

In the first 56 U.S. Opens played over 72 holes, only once was the winning score 280 or better—Ben Hogan shot 276 to win at Riviera in 1948, and it took nearly 20 years before Jack Nicklaus broke the record at Baltusrol.

Matt Kuchar summed it best two years ago when talking about lower scoring.

"It is what we should expect," Kuchar said. "Guys in any sport have figured out how to get better with all the extra work and study and whatever else. We see it everywhere, whether it's the track or the pool. We continue to see better numbers posted."

Why should golf be any different?

The U.S. Open returns to Winged Foot next year for the first time since 2006, when Geoff Ogilvy won at 285 (5 over) and the U.S. Open set an unofficial, modern record of highest score to par with the fewest complaints.

High scoring doesn't mean it was too tough. Low scoring doesn't mean it was too easy.

That's what the USGA seems to have figured out.

And that's why the USGA, subjected to so much criticism in recent years, should feel as good as the guy to whom it gave the trophy.

Getting Started/Comments Policy

Getting started

  1. 1. If you frequently comment on news websites then you may already have a Disqus account. If so, click the "Login" button at the top right of the comment widget and choose whether you'd rather log in with Facebook, Twitter, Google, or a Disqus account.
  2. 2. If you've forgotten your password, Disqus will email you a link that will allow you to create a new one. Easy!
  3. 3. If you're not a member yet, Disqus will go ahead and register you. It's seamless and takes about 10 seconds.
  4. 4. To register, either go through the login process or just click in the box that says "join the discussion," type your comment, and either choose a social media platform to log you in or create a Disqus account with your email address.
  5. 5. If you use Twitter, Facebook or Google to log in, you will need to stay logged into that platform in order to comment. If you create a Disqus account instead, you'll need to remember your Disqus password. Either way, you can change your display name if you'd rather not show off your real name.
  6. 6. Don't be a huge jerk or do anything illegal, and you'll be fine.

Texarkana Gazette Comments Policy

The Texarkana Gazette web sites include interactive areas in which users can express opinions and share ideas and information. We cannot and do not monitor all of the material submitted to the website. Additionally, we do not control, and are not responsible for, content submitted by users. By using the web sites, you may be exposed to content that you may find offensive, indecent, inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise objectionable. You agree that you must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with, the use of the Gazette web sites and any content on the Gazette web sites, including, but not limited to, whether you should rely on such content. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you acknowledge that we shall have the right (but not the obligation) to review any content that you have submitted to the Gazette, and to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content that we determine, in our sole discretion, (a) does not comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement; (b) might violate any law, infringe upon the rights of third parties, or subject us to liability for any reason; or (c) might adversely affect our public image, reputation or goodwill. Moreover, we reserve the right to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content at any time, for the reasons set forth above, for any other reason, or for no reason. If you believe that any content on any of the Gazette web sites infringes upon any copyrights that you own, please contact us pursuant to the procedures outlined in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (Title 17 U.S.C. § 512) at the following address:

Copyright Agent
The Texarkana Gazette
15 Pine Street
Texarkana, TX 75501
Phone: 903-794-3311
Email: webeditor@texarkanagazette.com